Check a specific nursing home
Search 14,000+ Medicare-certified facilities by name, city, or ZIP — see violations, staffing, and safety signals.
Key Takeaways
- Accident prevention (F0689) was the single most-cited deficiency in recent inspections, with 486 citations in less than two months
- Infection control (F0880) and quality of care (F0684) continue to challenge nursing homes, drawing 413 and 342 citations respectively
- Resident rights violations, including freedom from abuse and dignity protections, remain common citation areas
- Food safety and medication management both appear in the top five most-cited standards
- These numbers show what inspectors are finding now, but don't indicate how serious each violation was or whether it was corrected
Between late March and mid-May 2026, federal inspectors cited nursing homes across the country for thousands of regulatory violations. These citations, called "deficiencies" or "F-tags," tell families which care standards facilities are struggling to meet right now.
The data covers 54 days of inspections ending May 21, 2026. It shows what inspectors found during both routine surveys and complaint investigations. Understanding which violations are most common can help families ask better questions when choosing or monitoring a nursing home.
This snapshot reflects current enforcement priorities and the challenges nursing homes face today. The numbers represent individual citations, not facilities—some homes received multiple citations for the same issue.
Accident prevention tops the list. F0689, which requires nursing homes to keep residents "free from accident hazards," received 486 citations between March 29 and May 7, 2026. This regulation covers everything from fall prevention to safe equipment use. When inspectors cite F0689, they've found conditions that could lead to preventable injuries.
Infection control remains a major concern. F0880, the infection prevention and control standard, drew 413 citations through May 14. This tag became more prominent during the COVID-19 pandemic and continues to reflect ongoing challenges in basic infection control practices like hand hygiene, isolation protocols, and equipment sanitation.
Quality of care citations remain frequent. F0684, which covers whether residents receive care to maintain or improve their highest level of well-being, accumulated 342 citations through May 15. This is one of the broadest quality standards, encompassing everything from skin care to assistance with daily activities. It's often cited when inspectors see a pattern of declining resident function that staff should have prevented.
Food service and pharmacy issues round out the top five. F0812 (food procurement, storage, and sanitation) received 283 citations, while F0656 (pharmacy services and medication errors) drew 258 citations through May 20. These violations can directly affect resident health—unsafe food handling can cause illness, and medication errors can have serious consequences.
Resident rights violations are common. F0600, covering the fundamental right to be "free from abuse and neglect," received 230 citations through May 1. F0609, which addresses residents' rights to be treated with dignity and respect, drew 224 citations through May 7. These citations don't necessarily mean abuse occurred—they can also reflect inadequate abuse prevention policies or failure to investigate allegations properly.
Comprehensive assessments and care plans appear in the top ten. F0761 (comprehensive care plans) received 214 citations through May 15, while F0755 (comprehensive resident assessments) drew 192 citations through May 6. These regulations require facilities to thoroughly evaluate each resident's needs and create detailed care plans. Citations here suggest facilities aren't documenting or updating care plans as required.
What this data doesn't tell us. These numbers reflect citation frequency, not severity. A facility can receive one citation for a minor paperwork issue or multiple citations for serious harm. The data also doesn't show which facilities were cited or whether violations were corrected. Some regulatory areas, like staffing levels, may not appear in the top ten even though they affect many other outcomes.
How to Read This
- Abuse & Neglect (citations: F600, F609)
- Inspectors found that a resident was mistreated, that the facility failed to prevent abuse, or that staff did not report or investigate allegations of abuse promptly.
- Accident Prevention (citations: F689)
- The facility failed to identify and remove physical hazards or provide adequate supervision that could lead to resident injuries such as burns, falls, or cuts.
- Care Planning (citations: F656)
- The facility did not create or maintain a personalized care plan that addresses each resident's specific health needs, goals, and preferences.
- Dignity & Respect (citations: F550)
- Staff did not consistently treat residents with the respect and courtesy they deserve, or residents were not given choices that allow them to maintain their sense of self.
- Fall Prevention (citations: F689)
- The facility failed to assess residents' fall risk or put a proper prevention plan in place, resulting in a resident falling and possibly being injured.
- Food Safety & Sanitation (citations: F812)
- Food was not stored, prepared, or served in a safe and sanitary way, creating a risk of foodborne illness for residents.
- Infection Control (citations: F880)
- The facility did not consistently follow hygiene and sanitation practices that prevent the spread of infections, including proper hand-washing, isolation procedures, and equipment cleaning.
- Medication Management (citations: F761)
- The facility had problems ensuring residents received the right medications at the right times, including errors in prescribing, dispensing, or monitoring for side effects.
- Pharmacy Services (citations: F761, F755)
- The facility's pharmacy practices had problems — such as inaccurate medication records, missing reviews by a pharmacist, or drugs not being dispensed correctly.
- Quality of Care (citations: F684)
- Residents did not receive the medical treatments, therapies, or personal care services they needed to maintain or improve their health and well-being.
- Resident Rights (citations: F550)
- The facility did not fully respect residents' legal rights — such as privacy, the right to make decisions about their own care, or the right to raise concerns without fear of retaliation.
- Severity scale (A–L)
- CMS rates each citation A–L. A–C means no resident harm, D–F means potential for harm to residents, G–I means actual harm, and J–L means immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.
Data source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Data as of 2026-05-21.
Helpful resources
- Search every certified nursing facility (all 50 states)
- See a sample facility safety report
- How Senior Care Report Card works
- Resources Hub: guides for families
- About our editorial standards
Browse high-demand state hubs
How we built this: Every Senior Care Report Card insight is generated from the federal CMS Care Compare dataset and reviewed by our editorial team before publishing. We do not invent numbers, and we always tell you the date the data was collected. Read our methodology →