← Senior Care Report Card Insights

Nursing Home Staffing Data: State-by-State Benchmarks (2026)

Hawaii leads the nation with an 88.2 average staffing score, while Texas trails at 37.9—a 50-point gap that highlights dramatic regional differences in nurse coverage.

Published May 14, 2026 · CMS data as of May 21, 2026

Check a specific nursing home

Search 14,000+ Medicare-certified facilities by name, city, or ZIP — see violations, staffing, and safety signals.

Key Takeaways

  • Hawaii leads the nation with an average staffing score of 88.2 across 42 facilities, while Texas trails at 37.9 across 1,176 homes.
  • The national average staffing score is 55.5 out of 100, and 45.9% of all facilities score below the midpoint of 50.
  • States in the upper Midwest and Pacific Northwest—including Minnesota, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Washington, and Oregon—consistently rank in the top ten for nurse coverage.
  • Lower state averages do not mean every facility is unsafe, but they signal families should ask detailed questions about daily nurse-to-resident ratios on all shifts.
  • Staffing is the most consistent predictor of nursing home care quality, influencing infection rates, fall prevention, and timely response to resident needs.

Across the 14,696 Medicare-certified nursing homes evaluated in this analysis, the average staffing score stands at 55.5 out of 100 as of May 21, 2026. Staffing—the number of nurses and aides caring for residents each day—is the most consistent predictor of care quality in long-term care facilities.

Yet staffing levels vary dramatically by state. Hawaii currently leads the nation with an average score of 88.2, while Texas scores just 37.9—a difference that can translate to meaningful gaps in how quickly staff can respond to call bells, manage medications, and prevent falls. Nearly half of all facilities nationwide (45.9%) score below the midpoint of 50.

The tables below highlight where nursing home staffing is strongest and where families should ask the most detailed questions about daily nurse-to-resident ratios before choosing a facility.

Top-Ranked States Show Consistent Strength

Hawaii's 42 facilities average a staffing score of 88.2, far exceeding the national benchmark. Maine follows at 78.6 across 78 homes, and Minnesota—with a much larger pool of 338 facilities—maintains a strong 76.0 average. North Dakota (75.8 across 72 homes) and Wisconsin (75.2 across 323 homes) round out the top five. The top ten also includes Washington (73.8), Alaska (72.6), Oregon (72.1), Delaware (71.7), and Utah (71.0). These states demonstrate that strong staffing can be sustained across both small and large nursing home markets.

Southern and Central States Trail National Benchmarks

Texas, with the largest number of facilities in the bottom tier—1,176 homes—scores an average of just 37.9. Missouri (40.1 across 488 facilities) and Louisiana (40.4 across 266 facilities) also rank near the bottom. Oklahoma (42.2), Georgia (44.2), North Carolina (48.8), Arkansas (49.3), New Mexico (49.5), Virginia (51.1), and South Carolina (52.0) complete the bottom ten. Lower scores do not mean every facility in these states provides poor care, but the state-level averages signal that families should compare individual homes carefully and request specific staffing numbers for day, evening, and night shifts.

What the Numbers Mean for Families

Staffing scores are built from payroll-based data reported to Medicare, reflecting actual nurse and aide hours relative to the number of residents. A score of 55.5 represents the current national average; facilities scoring well below that threshold may struggle to provide timely assistance with daily activities, medication management, and emergency response. Conversely, homes scoring in the 70s and 80s typically maintain higher nurse-to-resident ratios, which research links to fewer pressure ulcers, infections, and preventable hospitalizations.

The 50-point gap between Hawaii and Texas underscores how much state-level factors—including Medicaid reimbursement rates, labor markets, and regulatory standards—shape staffing. Families researching nursing homes in lower-scoring states should ask each facility for its current staffing plan, including how many registered nurses (RNs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs), and certified nursing assistants (CNAs) are scheduled per shift, and whether those levels hold on weekends and holidays.

Context and Caveats

This analysis covers Medicare-certified nursing homes only; it does not include assisted living facilities or memory care communities that are not Medicare-certified. Staffing scores are averaged at the state level, so individual facilities within a state can and do vary widely. A low state average does not mean every home there is understaffed, just as a high state average does not guarantee every facility meets that benchmark. Always compare individual facility scores and visit in person to observe staff availability during different times of day.

How to Read This

Care Safety score
A 0–100 score we calculate from CMS inspection history, staffing data, citation patterns, and complaint summaries. Higher is better. We group facilities into bands: Excellent, Good, Fair, and Poor.

Data source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Data as of 2026-05-21.

How we built this: Every Senior Care Report Card insight is generated from the federal CMS Care Compare dataset and reviewed by our editorial team before publishing. We do not invent numbers, and we always tell you the date the data was collected. Read our methodology →