Check a specific nursing home
Search 14,000+ Medicare-certified facilities by name, city, or ZIP — see violations, staffing, and safety signals.
Most families do not search for "statewide nursing home risk." They search for something more immediate:
- nursing homes near me
- nursing homes in San Antonio
- nursing homes in Chicago
- nursing home violations in Houston
- best nursing homes near Fort Worth
- nursing home ratings near me
- compare nursing homes by city
That is why the city-level view matters.
The May 2026 CMS nursing home data shows that Texas and Illinois are not just high-risk at the state level. Risk is concentrated in specific local markets where families may face a difficult choice: many nearby facilities carry concerning signals at the same time.
Senior Care Report Card processed the May 2026 CMS release across 14,696 nursing homes. Nationally, 27.2% of facilities fell into the Concerning or Poor bands. In Texas, the share was 48.8%. In Illinois, it was 46.9%.
But the more useful question is local: which cities deserve extra caution?
Texas cities with the highest number of concerning or poor facilities
Texas has 1,176 nursing homes in the May 2026 dataset. Of those, 574 are currently in the Concerning or Poor bands.
The largest Texas city-level risk counts are:
| City | Facilities | Concerning/Poor | Share at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| San Antonio | 58 | 31 | 53.4% |
| Houston | 60 | 29 | 48.3% |
| Fort Worth | 31 | 22 | 71.0% |
| Dallas | 33 | 18 | 54.5% |
| Austin | 25 | 17 | 68.0% |
| El Paso | 21 | 13 | 61.9% |
| Waco | 13 | 10 | 76.9% |
| Lubbock | 14 | 9 | 64.3% |
| Arlington | 9 | 7 | 77.8% |
These numbers do not mean there are no good options in these cities. They mean families should not assume that "nearby" equals "safe enough."
In some local markets, most available options may require deeper review.
Illinois cities where families should compare carefully
Illinois has 667 nursing homes in the current data. Of those, 313 are in the Concerning or Poor bands.
The city-level picture shows the same pattern:
| City | Facilities | Concerning/Poor | Share at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago | 77 | 46 | 59.7% |
| Decatur | 5 | 5 | 100.0% |
| Joliet | 7 | 5 | 71.4% |
| Belleville | 5 | 4 | 80.0% |
| Rockford | 12 | 5 | 41.7% |
Chicago stands out because of its raw count: 46 facilities in the Concerning or Poor bands. Smaller cities like Decatur, Joliet, and Belleville stand out because the proportion of higher-risk options is so high.
For a family trying to find care within driving distance, that can change the decision process.
Why city-level risk is different from state-level risk
Statewide averages are useful for policy. City-level data is useful for families.
A statewide score tells you whether a market is broadly stronger or weaker. A city-level view tells you what a family may actually face when they need a bed within 20 or 30 miles.
Two families in the same state can face very different realities:
- One may live near several facilities with strong records.
- Another may live in a city where most nearby options show serious inspection, staffing, complaint, or penalty concerns.
That is why families should compare locally before accepting a placement.
The emotional trap: choosing from a short list
In a hospital discharge situation, families are often given a short list of facilities that have beds available. The list may feel official. It may feel like a recommendation.
But availability is not the same as quality.
A facility may have an open bed because it is large, because it has high turnover, because it accepts a certain payer mix, or simply because timing worked out. The availability list does not automatically tell you which facilities have repeated deficiencies, poor staffing indicators, enforcement history, or complaint patterns.
That is where public data gives families leverage.
A better way to use the data
If you are searching in a high-risk city, do not try to read every CMS record from scratch.
Use a three-step filter.
Step 1: Remove the riskiest options first
Start by identifying facilities in the Poor or Concerning bands. These facilities may still be worth evaluating in some circumstances, but they should not be treated the same as stronger alternatives.
Step 2: Look for recent movement
A facility that recently dropped sharply deserves extra scrutiny. The May 2026 update found serious score drops in both Texas and Illinois, including:
| Facility | State | City | Score change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balch Springs Nursing Home | TX | Balch Springs | 73 -> 44 |
| Avir at Texarkana | TX | Texarkana | 62 -> 38 |
| The Haven on the River | IL | Grayville | 51 -> 30 |
| Three Crowns Park | IL | Evanston | 74 -> 54 |
| Alden Long Grove Rehab & HC Ctr | IL | Long Grove | 66 -> 47 |
Ask what changed. A score drop is not a diagnosis, but it is a signal.
Step 3: Compare the reason, not just the score
Two facilities can have the same overall score for different reasons. One may have staffing weakness. Another may have repeated inspection citations. Another may have penalty history or complaint signals.
The right question is not only "What is the score?"
The better question is: What is driving the score?
What to ask if you are choosing in a high-risk city
Bring the data into the conversation.
Ask:
- Your current record places you in a Concerning or Poor band. What are the main drivers?
- Did your latest CMS data include new deficiencies, penalties, or complaint findings?
- What is your current RN staffing pattern on nights and weekends?
- Were any citations repeated from prior inspection cycles?
- What changed after your most recent Plan of Correction?
- How do you communicate serious incidents to families?
If the facility cannot answer clearly, that itself is useful information.
A local story with national implications
Texas and Illinois are not the only states with risk. But they are important because they show how state-level pressure and city-level reality can overlap.
In Texas, families in San Antonio, Houston, Fort Worth, Dallas, Austin, El Paso, Waco, Lubbock, and Arlington should compare carefully.
In Illinois, families in Chicago, Decatur, Joliet, Belleville, and Rockford should do the same.
The purpose of this data is not to scare families. It is to give them back time, language, and leverage.
When the choice is urgent, the safest first step is not a tour. It is a comparison.
—
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Texas cities have the most concerning nursing home records? In the May 2026 data, San Antonio, Houston, Fort Worth, Dallas, Austin, El Paso, Waco, Lubbock, and Arlington had notable numbers or shares of facilities in the Concerning or Poor bands.
Which Illinois cities should families review carefully? Chicago had the highest raw count of Concerning or Poor facilities. Decatur, Joliet, Belleville, and Rockford also showed important local risk patterns.
Does a high-risk city mean every nursing home there is unsafe? No. It means families should compare facilities carefully instead of assuming nearby options are similar.
What should I check before choosing a nursing home? Check inspection citations, repeat deficiencies, staffing, penalties, complaints, quality outcomes, recent score changes, and ownership history.
How often does this data update? CMS updates nursing home data monthly. Senior Care Report Card processes the updated files and recalculates facility-level safety scores.
—
Helpful resources
- Search every certified nursing facility (all 50 states)
- See a sample facility safety report
- How Senior Care Report Card works
- Resources Hub: guides for families
- About our editorial standards
Browse high-demand state hubs
How we built this: Every Senior Care Report Card insight is generated from the federal CMS Care Compare dataset and reviewed by our editorial team before publishing. We do not invent numbers, and we always tell you the date the data was collected. Read our methodology →