← Back to search results

THE CENTER AT GRANDE

TYLER, TX · Smith County · For profit - Limited Liability company · 96 certified beds

📍 3219 East Grande Boulevard, Tyler, TX 75707  ·  📞 (719) 522-2000

Medicare ID: 676443  ·  Last Medicare inspection: Nov 16, 2025

Overall Safety Score
81
out of 100
Generally Positive
Component Scores
100
Inspection
59
Staffing
✓ Clean
Enforcement
95
Complaints
50
Quality
📋 Last inspected: November 16, 2025 📦 CMS data as of: May 2026

Score Breakdown

Inspection
100
Staffing
59
Enforcement
100
Complaints
95
Quality Outcomes
50

What the numbers mean

THE CENTER AT GRANDE scored 81 out of 100 — 26 points above the state average of 55.

📋 Inspections: 9 citations over the last 36 months — 21 fewer than the state average (30). None were rated as causing actual harm to residents.

⚠️ Staffing: Staffing levels are below average. Lower staffing is associated with longer response times, more pressure injuries, and higher hospitalization rates. Ask the facility directly about their RN-to-resident ratio and how they handle shortfalls.

⚖️ Penalties & enforcement: No significant federal fines or enforcement actions on record — a positive indicator of consistent regulatory compliance.

💬 Complaints: Low complaint activity — few formal complaints from residents or families have triggered inspections. Ask if there is a family council you can speak with.

⚠️ Resident quality outcomes: Some quality measures are below national benchmarks. Areas like fall prevention, pain management, or medication use may warrant closer attention.

🔍 Most cited areas: The facility had a problem with corridor doors, smoke doors, or hallway barriers that are supposed to slow smoke and fire spread so residents have time to evacuate or shelter safely.. The full report provides the complete citation record with dates, severity levels, and plain-English descriptions.

What inspectors found (last 3 surveys)

9
Total citations
State avg: 29.9
0
Serious (G+)
State avg: 2.3
0
Repeat findings

Top concern areas

8
1
Fire Doors & Corridors
The facility had a problem with corridor doors, smoke doors, or hallway barriers that are supposed to slow smoke and fire spread so residents have time to evacuate or shelter safely.

⚖ Penalties & Enforcement

Federal civil monetary penalties (CMPs) are only issued after a facility has failed two levels of regulatory review — meaning problems were found on inspection and the facility could not rebut the findings. This is a serious escalation beyond a standard citation.

No federal penalties on record. CMS has not issued civil monetary penalties or payment denials against this facility in the current reporting period.
📋 Enforcement Context Analysis
Clean enforcement record — No significant federal enforcement actions or fines on record for this facility. This is a positive indicator.
✅ No enforcement actions on record. This facility's enforcement score of 100/100 reflects a clean enforcement history in the current CMS reporting cycle.

📅 Per-action enforcement records (date, fine amount, and penalty type for each individual action) are sourced from a separate CMS enforcement dataset and will be added in a future data update.

🩹

Resident Wellbeing — Key Indicators

These are the measures families ask about most. They come from CMS clinical assessments of every resident — not just inspection reports. Stars (★) count toward the official CMS quality star rating.

Re-hospitalized after discharge
22.2% lower is better
How often short-stay residents who went home ended up back in the hospital within 30 days. Risk-adjusted for resident health.
Hospitalization rate
13.1% lower is better
How often long-stay residents were hospitalized over the past year. Adjusted for how sick residents were.

Source: CMS MDS Quality Measures & Medicare claims data. Scores shown are the most recent 4-quarter averages for long-stay residents.

Track this facility with free email alerts

Get notified when new inspections, citations, score changes, or enforcement actions are published for this facility.

No account or payment required. Enter your email and we will save this facility-watch request.

What to know about The Center At Grande

The Center At Grande is a Medicare-certified nursing home in Tyler, Tx with 96 certified beds. Its current Senior Care Report Card score is 81/100, placing it in the Generally Positive range. The latest CMS survey date in our data is Nov 16, 2025. Over the last 36 months, our CMS citation data shows 9 citations. Families comparing this facility should pay close attention to staffing, quality outcomes before scheduling a tour or accepting placement. Ownership type on file: For profit - Limited Liability company.

🟢
Overall Assessment — Generally Positive  ·  81/100
This facility performs well overall. A few areas are worth reviewing before making a final decision.
What to do next: Worth considering. Check the specific areas flagged below during your facility tour.
👥
Staffing Below Federal Minimum Standards
This facility provides 0.41 RN hours per resident per day — below the CMS minimum of 0.75 hours. Total nurse staffing is 4.62 hours per resident per day. Understaffing is the strongest predictor of poor inspection outcomes. Ask specifically about RN coverage on evenings, nights, and weekends.

What this facility's data shows

📋 Inspections
Inspection record is above average — few deficiencies, no serious findings.
👥 Staffing
Staffing is below recommended levels. Ask about RN coverage on nights and weekends.
⚖ Penalties
No significant federal enforcement actions or fines in the record.
💬 Complaints
Complaint activity is low — few formal complaints filed by residents or families.
Multiple quality measures are below national benchmarks. Ask management directly about resident care practices.
Score breakdown — the numbers behind this assessment
👥 Staffing 59
What it measures RN hours per resident per day, total nurse hours, and RN turnover rate.
💡 Understaffing is the strongest single predictor of poor inspection outcomes.
📋 Inspection 100
What it measures Number, severity (A–L), and scope of deficiencies found. Repeat findings carry extra weight.
💡 Every citation in Section D feeds directly into this score.
⚖ Penalties 100
What it measures Whether CMS escalated from a deficiency citation to actual financial or operational sanctions.
💡 A penalty means the facility already failed a second level of regulatory review.
💬 Complaints 95
What it measures Volume of complaint-triggered inspections and the share that were substantiated.
💡 Complaint surveys are unannounced — they often surface issues annual surveys miss.
🎯 Quality outcomes 50
What it measures Resident outcome measures: falls, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic use, weight loss, hospitalizations.
💡 Reflects the lived experience of residents beyond what inspectors observe.

Each pillar scores 0–100 and is combined into the overall score. A strong overall can mask a weak pillar — compare all four and see how they stack against the state average in Section B.

🏗 How This Facility Compares to TX State Averages

Comparing a facility to others in the same state puts its score in context. A facility might have 8 citations and that could be above average in one state and below in another. Green means this facility is doing better than its peers; red means it's falling short.

Metric This facility TX avg vs. State
Overall score
The combined Senior Care Report Card score out of 100.
81 55 ▲ Better than state avg
Inspection score
How well the facility performs on standard health surveys.
100 49 ▲ Better than state avg
Staffing score
RN hours, total nurse hours, and staff turnover from CMS payroll data.
59 38 ▲ Better than state avg
Penalty score
Fines, payment denials, and enforcement actions on file.
100 52 ▲ Better than state avg
Complaint score
Volume of complaint surveys and substantiated complaints.
95 81 ▲ Better than state avg
Quality score
Resident clinical outcomes vs national benchmarks: falls, antipsychotics, pain, vaccination, hospitalizations.
50 68 ▼ Worse than state avg
Citations (3 yrs)
Total number of deficiencies cited in the last 36 months.
9 29.9 ▲ Better than state avg
Serious citations
Citations rated severity G or higher (actual harm or immediate jeopardy).
0 2.3 ▲ Better than state avg

📅 Inspection Timeline

State health inspectors visit nursing homes on a regular cycle — typically every 12 to 15 months — and document every deficiency they find. The timeline below shows the date and scale of each inspection visit over the past several years. A pattern of worsening surveys is a red flag even if the most recent visit looks clean.

2025-11-16
1 citations
2025-03-12
1 citations
2025-03-06
1 citations
2024-02-07
6 citations
2022-12-07
1 citations

Bar length proportional to citation count. Red = serious findings (severity G+). Orange = elevated. Green = low.

📄 Full Citation Record

Every time state inspectors visit a nursing home, they write up anything that doesn’t meet federal standards. Each write-up is called a citation.

Each citation shows what the problem was and how serious it was, using a color-coded badge:

Confused by codes like F0732 or K0363? Use the free inspection report decoder to understand F-tags, fire-safety K-tags, severity letters, and repeat findings. Get the decoder →
Green — No residents harmed Yellow — Risk of harm, no injury Orange — A resident was harmed Red — Life or safety in danger

A Repeat tag means the same problem appeared in a previous inspection — it was not fully corrected the first time. Citations shown cover the last two years.

Survey: 2025-11-16 1 citation(s)
F0580 No harm, could worsen
Notification of change in condition
Survey: 2025-03-12 1 citation(s)
F0640 No harm
F0640
Survey: 2025-03-06 1 citation(s)
F0602 No harm, could worsen
Investigate & correct alleged violations
🩹

How Are Residents Doing?

Inspections tell you whether a facility followed the rules. These measures tell you how residents actually fared — whether they fell, experienced pain, lost weight, or were over-medicated. CMS collects this data through regular clinical assessments that nurses complete for every resident. Unlike inspections, which happen once a year, these assessments happen continuously.

✓ Positive signal: Most star-rated quality measures for this facility are within a good range, suggesting residents\' day-to-day wellbeing compares favorably to typical nursing homes.

How to read these cards: Each card shows one measure. Lower percentages are better for most (e.g. fewer falls), but higher is better for vaccination rates and community return. ★ Star rating marks measures CMS uses in its official quality star rating.

Short Stay Residents — 2025Q1-2025Q4
★ Star rating
Worsening depression symptoms
0.1% lower is better
Share of long-stay residents whose depression got measurably worse over the past year — despite being in a care facility.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and a…
99.7% lower is better
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
Emergency room visits (short-stay)
96.9% lower is better
Share of short-stay residents sent to the ER during their recovery stay. ER visits are disruptive for recovering patients and sometimes avoidable with better on-site clinical management.

Source: CMS MDS Quality Measures (2025Q1-2025Q4). Collected via standardized clinical assessments — not inspector visits.

🏥

Hospitalization & ER Visits

These numbers come directly from Medicare claims — real billing records of every time a resident was hospitalized or sent to the emergency room. They\'re among the most objective measures of care quality because they can\'t be influenced by how a facility writes up an assessment. The adjusted score is the most meaningful number — it\'s been corrected to account for how sick residents were, so a facility treating frailer patients isn\'t unfairly penalized.

What to look for: An adjusted score significantly above the expected score means this facility hospitalizes residents more often than peer facilities with similar patient populations — that gap is worth asking about directly.

Short Stay Residents — 20241001-20250930
★ Star rating
Re-hospitalized after going home
22.2% risk-adjusted rate
Actual: 19.4% Expected: 20.8%
About the same as similar facilities
How often short-stay residents who went home ended up back in the hospital within 30 days. A high rate suggests residents were discharged before they were ready, or that the facility didn't coordinate follow-up care well. Risk-adjusted so facilities treating sicker residents aren't unfairly penalized.
★ Star rating
Hospitalization rate (long-stay)
13.1% risk-adjusted rate
Actual: 12.1% Expected: 10.3%
About the same as similar facilities
How often long-stay residents were hospitalized over the past year, adjusted for how ill they were. A high rate relative to expectations suggests the facility may be sending residents to the hospital for issues that skilled nursing staff should be able to manage on-site.

Source: CMS Medicare claims data. Scores are risk-adjusted — they account for how ill residents were when admitted so facilities treating sicker populations aren\'t penalized for it.

💬 Questions to Ask Before Touring

These questions are generated specifically from this facility's score profile and citation history — not a generic checklist. A facility's willingness to answer them openly, and the quality of their answers, is itself an important signal. Bring this list when you tour or call.

  1. What is your current RN-to-resident ratio on each shift, and what is your annual staff turnover rate among nursing staff?
  2. Some resident outcome measures are below average here. What is your current approach to fall prevention, pain management, and quarterly medication review?
  3. Can we speak privately with two or three current residents or their families?

👪 Family Decision Guide

This guide translates this facility's data into practical next steps for families. It is not a recommendation for or against placement — it is a structured framework for the conversations you need to have before making a decision.

✓ Positives to confirm

  • Inspection record is above average — verify improvements are maintained
  • No significant penalty history — a positive indicator of consistent compliance
  • Low complaint activity — ask if there is a family council you can speak with
  • No serious-harm citations (G+) in the public record
  • No pattern of repeat violations detected

⚠ Areas to probe

  • Staffing concerns — request staffing schedules and ask about agency nurse use
  • Always speak with at least two current residents or family members independently

📈 Score History

The score is recalculated every time CMS releases updated data (typically monthly). A consistent downward trend is more concerning than a single low score. An improving trend after a period of poor performance may indicate management changes are taking effect. Use the free facility-watch form above to get email alerts when this facility's record changes materially.

2026-05-27
81 — Good

🏢 Ownership & Operators

Ownership matters because large corporate chains sometimes prioritize cost controls over care quality. CMS requires every nursing home to disclose its owners, operators, and managing employees. Frequent ownership changes can disrupt staffing and operations — which is why we flag facilities that changed ownership in the past 12 months.

🔗 KELLY, JULIE operates 5 facilities across DE, TX, CO. A mid-size operator; compare scores across their other facilities if evaluating multiple options.
Owner / Operator Role Ownership % Effective
KELLY, JULIE Individual 1970-01-01
MICHAELS, JAMES Individual 1970-01-01
EAST TEXAS MEDICAL CENTER REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM Organization 1970-01-01
ESMAS, BARTOLOME Individual 1970-01-01
VERITAS MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC Organization 1970-01-01
GOLDEN ROAD INVESTMENTS LLC Organization 1970-01-01
MURDOCK, MONTE Individual 1970-01-01
SENKOFF, ALEXANDER Individual 1970-01-01

🔔 Monthly tracking is now free

We check CMS data monthly. Use the tracking form above and we will email you when new citations appear, scores change, or enforcement actions are added.

📋
Monthly report update
New citation alerts
📈
Score trend tracking
🏠 Verify this data on Medicare.gov
All data in this report comes from the CMS Care Compare database. You can review the official public record directly on Medicare.gov — including the full inspection narrative, star ratings, and any recent enforcement actions.
View on Medicare.gov ↗

This report reflects publicly available CMS data only and is updated monthly. Severity codes and narratives are reproduced directly from the CMS health inspection database. Senior Care Report Card scores are independently computed and are not affiliated with or endorsed by CMS or Medicare.gov.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Senior Care Report Card safety score for The Center At Grande?
The Center At Grande has an independently computed Safety Score of 81 out of 100, based on CMS inspection findings, staffing levels, penalty history, complaint volume, and quality measures.
Where is The Center At Grande located?
The Center At Grande is located in Tyler, TX. View the full address, phone number, and a map at the top of this report.
How many beds does The Center At Grande have?
The Center At Grande is certified for 96 beds in the CMS Care Compare dataset.
When was the most recent CMS health inspection at The Center At Grande?
The most recent CMS health inspection summarized in this report was completed on November 16, 2025. CMS publishes a new inspection cycle approximately every 12 months.
What does the Senior Care Report Card Safety Score measure?
The Safety Score (0-100) combines five public-data signals: CMS health inspection severity, nursing staffing hours per resident, civil monetary penalties, complaint counts, and quality measures. Methodology and weightings are documented at /how-it-works/.
Is the report on The Center At Grande affiliated with the facility?
No. This report is independently computed from public CMS Care Compare data and is not affiliated with The Center At Grande, CMS, or Medicare.gov. It is provided as a research aid for families.

Data source: CMS Care Compare · Methodology · State Ombudsman

This report uses public CMS nursing home data and simplified scoring to help families ask better questions. It is not a recommendation, ranking, medical opinion, legal opinion, or substitute for an in-person visit. Source data last published by CMS: May 27, 2026.